Introduction.
Introduction.
Summary
I was an early example of retributive mental health diagnosis through analysis of internet speech incriminating of others, and not due to behavior, in 2010, at age 31. Sator’s Cutter and Tailor forum and archive, which contained more incriminating information about my aggressors from 2010-2011, mysteriously disappeared several years ago. Over the years, the predatory attacks against me using healthcare worsened, and turned into very serious predatory crime leading to physical and economic harm to me of a high degree in the federal jurisdiction. My healthcare became a corrupted collusive enterprise in service to predatory crime.
My internet speech since 2019, at first only through text chat and group or targeted email, has been a presented opportunity to force the criminal enterprise to either abandon or continue with its modus operandi until it is finally authoritatively stopped. The Next York Times covers some of the speech before that speech went public in February of 2022, but has been evolving into a larger, more socially contextualized effort since then.
What am I looking at?!
The Next York Times and Next York are a media operation, a security operation, a true corruption procedural, a healthcare effort, an emancipation, some kind of digital real estate, an art project and a frigging website, plus more. Let’s just call it a multimedia website to sound less pretentious.
This is an online entity concerned with the mechanics of misinformation, bias, and deceit more than ideology, opinion and belief. However, it still tests as having a traditional liberal political bias. Because the concerns are dry, we can’t be dry. The role of meme and absurdity on the Internet to cut through can’t be overlooked.
Less headily, the editor was a sometimes prickly graffiti writer and music producer in Brooklyn as a teen until getting beat up by Giuliani’s SWAT for the graffiti stuff, and then became a principal in the foundering family business after dropping out of the School of Visual Arts in 2000. After “being instrumental in saving the business” and getting acknowledged by The New York Times, that situation, uh, went south, and led directly to these efforts, under duress. The editor was a vocal social media objector from 2013-2021, but not on social media.
Next York itself was also a response to the observation that the Internet has supplanted New York as the primary location in space of cultural emergence.
Cyberspace > NYC. Even New York City lost its job to the Internet.
The Next York Times isn’t really a newspaper, but it was definitely inspired by print media. Its current model for the debut is the early Economist if it retained reputability while being meme-aware and cognizant of contemporary communication necessities.
It’s the logical emergent public face of a project started in 2018 called Next York to remake real space in a small way, with high stakes, through using textual communication in cyberspace in a provable time-stamped sequence, like a digital ledger. We do that a lot now, but we hardly acknowledge what we’re doing, and it’s not clear how conscious we are of this sea change or what it all means, legally. (No, we don’t mean “blockchain,” but it’s somewhat related.)
There would be no Next York Project possible without the actual city of New York, and real assets, people & history embedded there. In fact, the goal was to change the behavior of an entrenched network in New York City (that extends well beyond there), and it did. While under devious attack of some kind, all playing out in the federal jurisdiction.
Yes, it’s Next, and we’re slightly apologetic about it, but we promise to never be boring. We do acknowledge that cognitive dissonance and agitation was the first native currency of the internet, well before bitcoin. Cognitive dissonance and a desire to make it go away was the general response to this story, but the hope is it’s attractive enough for something now.
We just don’t have current personal use for long intellectual internet meanderings emulating “thought leadership”-style striving. We can kind of love that stuff, but times change and so do wise people. The 2010s are well over. We believe there’s a way to adapt to the new Internet pressures without degenerating. We endeavor to be as brief and non-dry as possible.Adapted Foreword
From Next York Field Guide, 2023, print book only available in NYC
The Next York Times debuted on Substack in December 2022. However, it includes content stretching back before that. The Next York Project started in 2018, and its primary goal was emancipation from an arcane healthcare and employment family business fraud scheme. (It may be harder to pull one of those after The Next York Times, but who knows.)
The Next York Project’s first publication was a hand-bound limited edition book called Gender Treaty that came off the Brooklyn press of Next York in December 2019. It was immediately sold only on the streets of New York City as a preliminary for the debut of The Next York Project, which was scheduled for beta in late 2020. There was no Internet presence, for a reason.
By late February of 2020, just two months after the book was completed, it was clear that the SARS-CoV-19 pandemic had axed those plans.
As the author’s grandmother says, “If you want to make God laugh, tell God your plans,” and that suddenly came into effect for most of us. But a curious thing happened: the book that joked it was meant to be an in-person version of Bumble or Hinge for the author, which it wasn’t, led to exactly that, quickly.
The author gave a copy of the book to a friend of a friend at the last party of Feb 2020 before the pandemic news dropped, just weeks before lockdown. This initial connection led to an eventual beautiful pandemic cohabitation in Montclair, NJ, historic Illuminati media stronghold, where this Next York strategy evolved at a rapid clip. Next York was now located in the “bedroom community of The New York Times” for almost two years.
The primary reason the book was written was a fight the author was engaged in regarding his 100 year-old NYC family tailoring business and an even more illegal and wrongful than Britney Spears type “mental health” business scam requiring emancipation from, or else. Early 2019 had seen this conflict spill over into the author’s network intentionally, through the medium of the author’s group emails, a few months after some assets moved.
Gender Treaty was written quickly in a constrained prose form in order to train for an internet campaign the author had planned for later, which would involve live writing on Twitter. That training paid off, and the live writing campaign was called The Next York Times in Feb 2022, which despite not allowing followers, attracted seven figure views, got involved in several big controversies seemingly out of nowhere, and ran the author’s story in some depth for the first time. It was chaotic shoehorning it all into the Twitter format, but notably high-volume in production.
That story was initially acknowledged that Feb using LinkedIn, in concise form, integrated into the employment history section. The author had been gaslit about something so legitimate (and criminal) that it could be listed as part of LinkedIn employment history. This was the moment of truth that would determine if lawsuits or more nefarious retaliation would commence against the author for public speech. There were multiple resourced parties with incentive that could outspend the author 10,000:1 or more. (We’re skipping over describing years of preliminary work here.)
The Twitter campaign was launched at the same time in order to support the LinkedIn disclosure, with an assumed private and minimal audience who had skin in the game. For this reason The Next York Times didn’t allow followers, as it was exploratory to see if there could be legal action. Also, the sheer volume of tweeting and retweeting meant it would have terrorized followers’ Twitter feeds.
As The Next York Times began retweeting en masse in a linear upside-down newspaper style and getting involved in the incredible Twitter information warfare that was going on at the time of the Twitter acquisition announcement, there was one follower it couldn’t block and then unblock to shake: Sarah Collins Rudolph, a survivor of a KKK church bombing in the 1960s, who lost her sister Addie Mae to the event.
Gender Treaty, the real launch of Next York in 2019, was kept from Internet presence and distributed only in person because it was actually an early tactical part of the emancipation campaign. It was deliberately provocative in a targeted way that wasn’t intended to be a matter of permanent record. This is related to the conception of Identity Warfare, one of the foundational models of the Next York Project. It carries over directly into The Next York Times.
The Next York Times calls itself America’s Journal of Identity Warfare.
With that, we leave you to discover the strange and novel cyberspace city of Next York as it builds. You’re extremely early, so good on you. ▪️
