Discover more from The Next York Times
Experiencing Total Dehumanization
Dehumanizers are the least human, and the clock is a way around them
Some people think they can create a perfect scapegoat with the predatory mental health socioeconomic scheme for gain, and it’s advanced generally to the point where it can be out-and-out evil to the point of horror. Once trapped, you can’t necessarily speak openly about what others are doing to harm you in the moment, because it can be used as “evidence” of some kind of vague and nonsensical mental health “thing” to try to shut you up and retaliate, collusively.
The predators have to claim that an individual’s incriminating speech about them is the result of “mental illness,” one of our least technically meaningful medical terms, and we are so out to lunch culturally it is often accepted, especially internally to dysfunctional families and by hired goons and stooges. It takes a lot of resources, effort and connections to run these kind of discrediting and crazy-making strategies, but the opportunity is there for those who have these things.
So you learn not to talk about it until later. They can pull their little stunts, and you have to stop them from working, but you take away their back up plan after it fails by not immediately reacting. This really, really, works, but takes a long time, as communication becomes subject to intentional staggering, and means they may “get away with it.” It’s very much in line with commercial release scheduling practices and other general cycles, so it’s more a matter of personal endurance, resilience, and security.
I had this kind of play executed repeatedly against me through my healthcare even after people were warned they had been completely detected, and it even continued after I captured it in a legal bind, because these twisted souls were emboldened but cornered. They were drunk on the idea of the power they thought they had through completely dehumanizing and devoicing a human being they didn’t actually have an issue with, other than their own attraction to, and fear of, the ruthlessness of power.
Another example outside of healthcare: at the Michael Andrews Bespoke welcoming party for my father in November 2018, where the only other family that showed up besides me that I can remember was my mother, my cousin Brad Falchuk, and his sister Aimee. Aimee in particular was involved in the malingering by proxy scheme, even living with my parents sometimes while they conceived and executed it, and is now a licensed mental health professional.
I was being ripped off and provoked about it with the rank smile of the archbrat, and if I could only cause a scene, it might get them off the hook for it and discredit me completely going forward. Nope, I did the opposite, had a great time, and got to work immediately eradicating corruption I could barely still comprehend back then, now that the legal opportunity had finally presented itself. If you’re going to be provoked into making a scene, make sure it gets the perps into trouble and not you.
Many involved think they have the right to say nothing about these kind of things, and simply avoid and marginalize to cope, which they do not. However, dysfunctional networks enforce this as a perversion of the concept of neutrality. It’s neutral like Switzerland filling its coffers during WWII, and gaining somehow. It’s also a way to try to make it look like a predatory conflict is sourced to the target, and this has been canonized by some corrupt in healthcare.
We all know that people are often taking sides while claiming not to be, because the default judgement is supposed to go to the more powerful. If they feel they have power, and they do and say nothing so the default judgement goes to the more powerful, this can appear to be justice to the degenerated, as their agenda was served. But it leaves a record of harm they were aware of, and they’re often left trying to explain, ridiculously, how their gain is somehow evidence of their being harmed. It gets unbelievably perverse, in my experience.
The pitiful but powerful group stonewalling in my case continues, and because no one has an explanation for it that would satisfy anyone of legitimacy as legitimate, they simply continue doubling down like ruined gambling addicts blaming the dealer. Never-ending, quiet, escalating predatory conflicts are created by this ruthlessness, where aggressors spend all of their energy trying to make it seem like the issue is their target. The rationalizations are usually absurd, but all they need is another person with sympathetic absurd rationalizations, and it’s like shopping. The wealthy have infinite more options in that.
Personally, I find the attraction to power repellant, but if you shy away too much, your disempowerment does their work for them. Many people essentially indicate they will continue with the pile-on until you figure out how to stop their ruthlessness and brutality, and will deny any and all opportunity to electively behave transparently and humanly. It appears to be compulsive, and taught.▪️
Bonus Provocation Resistance Strategy: While texting, block operators you need to go on record with after you hit send—who are provoking you by stonewalling & withholding etc and providing no meaningful communication. Then unblock them a little later and send another one. Boom: The provocation is never even seen, and what needed to be on the record is on the record!